GBHI vs IVV
Gabelli High Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GBHI or IVV?
High Yield Bond against Large Cap Blend.
GBHI has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GBHI | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.01%Best | 0.03% |
| AUM | $6M | $850.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.80% | 1.09% |
| Holdings | 195 | 1,018 |
| YTD Return | +2.22% | +11.79%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.71% | +12.11%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.40% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.69% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.4%Best | 13.4% |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | High Yield Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 17, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
GBHI vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GBHI vs IVV Performance
Gabelli High Income ETF (GBHI) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GBHI returned +3.71% while IVV returned +12.11%. Year to date, GBHI is up 2.22% versus a gain of 11.79% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.4% compared with 4.4% for GBHI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.40. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GBHI charges 0.01% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $1 vs $3 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GBHI currently yields 4.80% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.2% of IVV's money is in holdings GBHI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for GBHI, our book for it covers 48.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
3 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in GBHI and 505 in IVV, against full books of 195 and 1,018.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GBHI and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GBHI or IVV?
GBHI has an expense ratio of 0.01% while IVV charges 0.03%. GBHI is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GBHI or IVV?
Over the past year GBHI returned +3.71% vs +12.11% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GBHI or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 13.4% annualized versus 4.4% for GBHI.
Should I hold both GBHI and IVV?
GBHI and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.40, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GBHI or IVV?
GBHI yields 4.80% while IVV yields 1.09%, so GBHI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GBHI?
GBHI has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.