GDXY vs VTI
YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GDXY delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GDXY | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $238M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 87.83% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 14 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +4.56% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.18% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 34.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -37.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | May 20, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
GDXY vs VTI Performance
YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GDXY returned +34.18% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, GDXY is up 4.56% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GDXY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 34.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.0% for GDXY and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.07. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GDXY charges 1.00% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GDXY currently yields 87.83% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GDXY and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2790 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GDXY or VTI?
GDXY has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GDXY or VTI?
Over the past year GDXY returned +34.18% vs +22.35% for VTI, so GDXY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GDXY annualized +27.72% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GDXY or VTI?
GDXY has been the more volatile fund at 34.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GDXY -37.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GDXY and VTI?
GDXY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.07, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GDXY and VTI?
GDXY and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2790 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GDXY or VTI?
GDXY yields 87.83% while VTI yields 1.07%, so GDXY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.