GEMD vs IVV
Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GEMD | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $36M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.63% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 195 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -1.72% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.02% | +23.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.45% | +21.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 15, 2022 | May 15, 2000 |
GEMD vs IVV Performance
Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (GEMD) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GEMD returned +3.02% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, GEMD is down 1.72% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, GEMD compounded at +6.45% per year against +21.49% for IVV. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs +1.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.1% for GEMD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.6% for GEMD and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GEMD charges 0.30% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GEMD currently yields 5.63% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
GEMD and IVV share 0 holdings out of 597 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GEMD or IVV?
GEMD has an expense ratio of 0.30% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GEMD or IVV?
Over the past year GEMD returned +3.02% vs +23.70% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), GEMD annualized +1.11% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GEMD or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.1% for GEMD. Worst drawdown: GEMD -24.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GEMD and IVV?
GEMD and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GEMD and IVV?
GEMD and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 597 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GEMD or IVV?
GEMD yields 5.63% while IVV yields 1.09%, so GEMD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.