GGN vs SCHD
GAMCO Global Gold Natural Resources & Income Trust vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. GGN offers more diversification with 221 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGN | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.40% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $992M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.70% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 221 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +10.14% | +27.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.89% | +31.26% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.72% | +16.66% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +17.59% | +10.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.8% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -94.2% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 29, 2005 | Oct 20, 2011 |
GGN vs SCHD Performance
GAMCO Global Gold Natural Resources & Income Trust (GGN) is a ETF from Gabelli Funds and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year GGN returned +27.89% while SCHD returned +31.26%. Year to date, GGN is up 10.14% versus a gain of 27.67% for SCHD.
Over three years, GGN compounded at +23.72% per year against +16.66% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +17.59% and +10.18% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.57% annualized vs -3.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GGN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.8% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -94.2% for GGN and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGN charges 1.40% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $140 vs $6 annually, a gap of $134 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGN currently yields 6.70% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
GGN and SCHD share 7 holdings out of 163 unique holdings combined, representing a 11.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGN or SCHD?
GGN has an expense ratio of 1.40% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $134 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GGN or SCHD?
Over the past year GGN returned +27.89% vs +31.26% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), GGN annualized -3.75% vs +11.57% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GGN or SCHD?
GGN has been the more volatile fund at 26.8% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: GGN -94.2% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both GGN and SCHD?
GGN and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GGN and SCHD?
GGN and SCHD share 7 common holdings with a 11.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 163 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGN or SCHD?
GGN yields 6.70% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so GGN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.