GGN vs SCHD

GGN vs SCHD

Which is better, GGN or SCHD?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. GGN led over 3Y and 5Y, SCHD over 1Y and the full window. GGN is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.

Lower Fees: SCHDHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: GGN

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGGNSCHD
Expense Ratio1.40%0.06%Best
AUM$1.0B$112.1B
Dividend Yield6.70%3.00%
Holdings221103
YTD Return+9.55%+25.07%Best
1Y Return+17.39%+27.61%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+22.28%Best+15.74%
5Y Return (annualized)+16.38%Best+9.89%
Volatility (annualized)23.6%13.6%Best
Max Drawdown-87.7%-33.4%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$21,350Best$16,025
Top 10 Weight36.9%Best41.8%
Fund FamilyGabelli FundsCharles Schwab Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Value
InceptionMar 29, 2005Oct 20, 2011

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 20, 2011 to Sep 11, 2026 (14.9 years).

GGN vs SCHD growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.9 years both funds cover.

GGN vs SCHD Performance

GAMCO Global Gold Natural Resources & Income Trust (GGN) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year GGN returned +17.39% while SCHD returned +27.61%. Year to date, GGN is up 9.55% versus a gain of 25.07% for SCHD.

Over three years, GGN compounded at +22.28% per year against +15.74% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +16.38% and +9.89% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.36% annualized vs -3.61%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

GGN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.6% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -87.7% for GGN and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GGN charges 1.40% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $140 vs $6 annually, a gap of $134 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGN currently yields 6.70% against 3.00% for SCHD.

Holdings Overlap

GGN already in SCHD11.5%
SCHD already in GGN15.2%

11.5% of GGN's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 15.2% of SCHD's money is in holdings GGN also owns.

SCHD and GGN share little of their money.

The two holdings books were reported 153 days apart, GGN as of Mar 31, 2026 and SCHD as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

7 positions in common, counted across the 70 positions we hold weights for in GGN and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 221 and 103.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 92 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for GGN (84.7% of the fund), and 27 for GGN that do not appear in SCHD (44.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in GGNWeight in SCHDDifference
CVXChevron Corp.4.18%4.02%0.16%
COPConocophillips Co1.76%3.94%2.18%
SLBSchlumberger Nv.1.57%2.19%0.62%
EOGEog Resources Inc1.75%1.88%0.13%
OKEOneok Inc.1.22%1.47%0.25%
DVNDevon Energy Corp.0.64%1.36%0.72%
APAApa Corp0.40%0.37%0.03%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of GGN and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

GGNSCHD

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GGN or SCHD?

GGN has an expense ratio of 1.40% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $134 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, GGN or SCHD?

Over the past year GGN returned +17.39% vs +27.61% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), GGN annualized -3.61% vs +11.36% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, GGN or SCHD?

GGN has been the more volatile fund at 23.6% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: GGN -87.7% vs SCHD -33.4%.

Should I hold both GGN and SCHD?

GGN and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between GGN and SCHD?

15.2% of SCHD's money is in holdings GGN also owns. 15.2% of SCHD's is in holdings GGN also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 70 positions we hold weights for in GGN and 100 in SCHD.

Which pays a higher dividend, GGN or SCHD?

GGN yields 6.70% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so GGN currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SCHD better than GGN?

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. GGN led over 3Y and 5Y, SCHD over 1Y and the full window. GGN is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.