GGN vs VYM
GAMCO Global Gold Natural Resources & Income Trust vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, GGN or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GGN led over 3Y and 5Y, VYM over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGN | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.40% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $1.0B | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 6.70% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 221 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +9.55% | +13.91%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.39% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.28%Best | +18.12% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +16.38%Best | +12.17% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.6% | 14.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -93.3% | -58.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $21,350Best | $17,758 |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.9% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 29, 2005 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 16, 2006 to Sep 11, 2026 (19.8 years).
GGN vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.8 years both funds cover.
GGN vs VYM Performance
GAMCO Global Gold Natural Resources & Income Trust (GGN) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GGN returned +17.39% while VYM returned +17.57%. Year to date, GGN is up 9.55% versus a gain of 13.91% for VYM.
Over three years, GGN compounded at +22.28% per year against +18.12% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +16.38% and +12.17% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +6.95% annualized vs -4.85%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GGN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.6% compared with 14.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -93.3% for GGN and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGN charges 1.40% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $140 vs $4 annually, a gap of $136 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGN currently yields 6.70% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
38.6% of GGN's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 8.3% of VYM's money is in holdings GGN also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 91 days apart, GGN as of Mar 31, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
21 positions in common, counted across the 70 positions we hold weights for in GGN and 603 in VYM, against full books of 221 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 548 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for GGN (89.3% of the fund), and 14 for GGN that do not appear in VYM (18.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GGN | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 6.61% | 2.36% | 4.25% |
| NEMNewmont Corp. | 5.64% | 0.41% | 5.23% |
| CVXChevron Corp. | 4.18% | 1.28% | 2.90% |
| COPConocophillips Co | 1.76% | 0.53% | 1.23% |
| VLOValero Energy Corp. | 1.83% | 0.32% | 1.51% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 1.78% | 0.28% | 1.50% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 1.75% | 0.29% | 1.46% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 1.58% | 0.38% | 1.20% |
| SLBSchlumberger Nv. | 1.57% | 0.29% | 1.28% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp. | 1.53% | 0.31% | 1.22% |
38.6% of GGN is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGN or VYM?
GGN has an expense ratio of 1.40% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $136 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GGN or VYM?
Over the past year GGN returned +17.39% vs +17.57% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), GGN annualized -4.85% vs +6.95% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GGN or VYM?
GGN has been the more volatile fund at 27.6% annualized versus 14.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GGN -93.3% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GGN and VYM?
GGN and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GGN and VYM?
38.6% of GGN's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 8.3% of VYM's is in holdings GGN also owns. They hold 21 positions in common, counted across the 70 positions we hold weights for in GGN and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGN or VYM?
GGN yields 6.70% while VYM yields 2.22%, so GGN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than GGN?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GGN led over 3Y and 5Y, VYM over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.