GHMS vs IVV
Goose Hollow Multi-Strategy Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GHMS | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.42% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $17M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.03% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 29 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +3.61% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.37% | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -6.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Goose Hollow Capital Management LLC | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 14, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
GHMS vs IVV Performance
Goose Hollow Multi-Strategy Income ETF (GHMS) is a ETF from Goose Hollow Capital Management LLC and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GHMS returned +3.37% while IVV returned +22.61%. Year to date, GHMS is up 3.61% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 4.7% for GHMS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.6% for GHMS and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.29. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GHMS charges 1.42% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $142 vs $3 annually, a gap of $139 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GHMS currently yields 5.03% against 1.09% for IVV.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GHMS or IVV?
GHMS has an expense ratio of 1.42% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $139 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GHMS or IVV?
Over the past year GHMS returned +3.37% vs +22.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GHMS annualized +2.48% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GHMS or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 4.7% for GHMS. Worst drawdown: GHMS -6.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GHMS and IVV?
GHMS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.29, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, GHMS or IVV?
GHMS yields 5.03% while IVV yields 1.09%, so GHMS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.