GHMS vs VTI
Goose Hollow Multi-Strategy Income ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, GHMS or VTI?
High Yield Bond against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GHMS | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.42% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $17M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.03% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 29 | 3,543 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.7%Best | 11.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -6.6%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $10,502 | $15,230Best |
| Fund Family | Goose Hollow Capital Management LLC | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | High Yield Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 14, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 283 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. GHMS has data through Nov 25, 2025 and VTI through Sep 4, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 15, 2023 to Nov 25, 2025 (2 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.5% compared with 4.7% for GHMS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.6% for GHMS and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.26. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GHMS charges 1.42% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $142 vs $3 annually, a gap of $139 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GHMS currently yields 5.03% against 1.07% for VTI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GHMS and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GHMS or VTI?
GHMS has an expense ratio of 1.42% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $139 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, GHMS or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 11.5% annualized versus 4.7% for GHMS. Worst drawdown: GHMS -6.6% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both GHMS and VTI?
GHMS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.26, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GHMS or VTI?
GHMS yields 5.03% while VTI yields 1.07%, so GHMS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than GHMS?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.