GLDB vs IVV
IDX Alternative FIAT ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GLDB or IVV?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLDB | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $38M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.66% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 10 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -6.55% | +13.32%Best |
| 1Y Return | -7.95% | +17.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.72% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.20% |
| Fund Family | IDX Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
GLDB vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GLDB vs IVV Performance
IDX Alternative FIAT ETF (GLDB) is an ETF from IDX Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GLDB returned -7.95% while IVV returned +17.08%. Year to date, GLDB is down 6.55% versus a gain of 13.32% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLDB charges 0.95% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLDB currently yields 4.66% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 5 holdings in GLDB and 490 in IVV, totalling 69.2% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 5 positions we hold weights for in GLDB and 490 in IVV, against full books of 10 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GLDB and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLDB or IVV?
GLDB has an expense ratio of 0.95% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GLDB or IVV?
Over the past year GLDB returned -7.95% vs +17.08% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLDB or IVV?
GLDB yields 4.66% while IVV yields 1.06%, so GLDB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GLDB?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.