GLDB vs VTI

GLDB vs VTI

Which is better, GLDB or VTI?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns (1Y): VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGLDBVTI
Expense Ratio0.95%0.03%Best
AUM$38M$690.1B
Dividend Yield4.66%1.03%
Holdings103,524
YTD Return-8.75%+12.51%Best
1Y Return-10.12%+15.23%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.50%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.31%
Volatility (annualized)31.3%13.1%Best
Fund FamilyIDX FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Blend
InceptionOct 23, 2025May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

GLDB vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

GLDB vs VTI Performance

IDX Alternative FIAT ETF (GLDB) is an ETF from IDX Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GLDB returned -10.12% while VTI returned +15.23%. Year to date, GLDB is down 8.75% versus a gain of 12.51% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

GLDB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.3% compared with 13.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GLDB charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLDB currently yields 4.66% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 5 holdings in GLDB and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 65.8% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, GLDB as of Sep 18, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

0 positions in common, counted across the 5 positions we hold weights for in GLDB and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 10 and 3,524.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of GLDB and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

GLDBVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GLDB or VTI?

GLDB has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, GLDB or VTI?

Over the past year GLDB returned -10.12% vs +15.23% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, GLDB or VTI?

GLDB has been the more volatile fund at 31.3% annualized versus 13.1% for VTI.

Should I hold both GLDB and VTI?

GLDB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, GLDB or VTI?

GLDB yields 4.66% while VTI yields 1.03%, so GLDB currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than GLDB?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.