GLTR vs QQQ

GLTR vs QQQ

Which is better, GLTR or QQQ?

Precious Metals against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. GLTR led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, QQQ over the full window.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGLTRQQQ
Expense Ratio0.60%0.18%Best
AUM$2.7B$483.5B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.44%
Holdings5107
YTD Return-4.14%+17.95%Best
1Y Return+29.81%Best+21.77%
3Y Return (annualized)+31.48%Best+25.63%
5Y Return (annualized)+18.19%Best+15.24%
Volatility (annualized)20.3%17.2%Best
Max Drawdown-55.7%-35.1%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$23,062Best$20,324
Fund FamilyAberdeenInvesco (US)
CategoryCommodityEquity
StylePrecious MetalsLarge Cap Growth
InceptionOct 21, 2010Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 22, 2010 to Sep 18, 2026 (15.9 years).

GLTR vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15.9 years both funds cover.

GLTR vs QQQ Performance

abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) is an ETF from Aberdeen and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GLTR returned +29.81% while QQQ returned +21.77%. Year to date, GLTR is down 4.14% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.

Over three years, GLTR compounded at +31.48% per year against +25.63% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +18.19% and +15.24% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +18.27% annualized vs +6.28%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

GLTR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.3% compared with 17.2% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.7% for GLTR and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.20. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GLTR charges 0.60% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $18 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLTR currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of GLTR and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

GLTRQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GLTR or QQQ?

GLTR has an expense ratio of 0.60% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, GLTR or QQQ?

Over the past year GLTR returned +29.81% vs +21.77% for QQQ, so GLTR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), GLTR annualized +6.28% vs +18.27% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, GLTR or QQQ?

GLTR has been the more volatile fund at 20.3% annualized versus 17.2% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: GLTR -55.7% vs QQQ -35.1%.

Should I hold both GLTR and QQQ?

GLTR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.20, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, GLTR or QQQ?

GLTR yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than GLTR?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. GLTR led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, QQQ over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.