GLXU vs IVV
T-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLXU | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $13M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 16.50% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 3 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -55.88% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | -67.71% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 189.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -92.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 8, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
GLXU vs IVV Performance
T-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETF (GLXU) is a ETF from REX Shares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GLXU returned -67.71% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, GLXU is down 55.88% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GLXU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 189.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -92.7% for GLXU and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLXU charges 1.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $3 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLXU currently yields 16.50% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
GLXU and IVV share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLXU or IVV?
GLXU has an expense ratio of 1.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $147 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GLXU or IVV?
Over the past year GLXU returned -67.71% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GLXU annualized -75.74% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GLXU or IVV?
GLXU has been the more volatile fund at 189.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GLXU -92.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GLXU and IVV?
GLXU and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GLXU and IVV?
GLXU and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLXU or IVV?
GLXU yields 16.50% while IVV yields 1.10%, so GLXU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.