GLXU vs VYM
T-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 568 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLXU | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $13M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.69% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 3 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -64.90% | +16.78% | |
| 1Y Return | -82.29% | +24.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 189.1% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -92.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 8, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
GLXU vs VYM Performance
T-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETF (GLXU) is a ETF from REX Shares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GLXU returned -82.29% while VYM returned +24.43%. Year to date, GLXU is down 64.90% versus a gain of 16.78% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GLXU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 189.1% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -92.7% for GLXU and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLXU charges 1.50% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $4 annually, a gap of $146 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLXU currently yields 8.69% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
GLXU and VYM share 0 holdings out of 559 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLXU or VYM?
GLXU has an expense ratio of 1.50% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $146 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GLXU or VYM?
Over the past year GLXU returned -82.29% vs +24.43% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GLXU annualized -81.23% vs +7.11% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GLXU or VYM?
GLXU has been the more volatile fund at 189.1% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GLXU -92.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GLXU and VYM?
GLXU and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GLXU and VYM?
GLXU and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 559 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLXU or VYM?
GLXU yields 8.69% while VYM yields 2.86%, so GLXU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.