GMEU vs IVV
T-REX 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GMEU | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $14M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -42.42% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | -59.51% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 83.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -87.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 24, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
GMEU vs IVV Performance
T-REX 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF (GMEU) is a ETF from REX Shares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GMEU returned -59.51% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, GMEU is down 42.42% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GMEU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 83.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -87.0% for GMEU and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.05. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GMEU charges 1.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $3 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GMEU currently yields 0.00% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
GMEU and IVV share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GMEU or IVV?
GMEU has an expense ratio of 1.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $147 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GMEU or IVV?
Over the past year GMEU returned -59.51% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GMEU annualized -69.31% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GMEU or IVV?
GMEU has been the more volatile fund at 83.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GMEU -87.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GMEU and IVV?
GMEU and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.05, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GMEU and IVV?
GMEU and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GMEU or IVV?
GMEU yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.