GMOI vs VTI
GMO International Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GMOI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GMOI | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $658M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.64% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 163 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +21.36% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +36.28% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | GMO | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 28, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
GMOI vs VTI Performance
GMO International Value ETF (GMOI) is a ETF from GMO and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GMOI returned +36.28% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, GMOI is up 21.36% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 10.8% for GMOI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.7% for GMOI and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.19. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GMOI charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GMOI currently yields 2.64% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GMOI and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2964 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GMOI | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FIBK | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GMOI or VTI?
GMOI has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GMOI or VTI?
Over the past year GMOI returned +36.28% vs +21.39% for VTI, so GMOI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GMOI annualized +34.42% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GMOI or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 10.8% for GMOI. Worst drawdown: GMOI -14.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GMOI and VTI?
GMOI and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.19, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GMOI and VTI?
GMOI and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2964 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GMOI or VTI?
GMOI yields 2.64% while VTI yields 1.07%, so GMOI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.