GMUN vs QQQ
Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, GMUN or QQQ?
Municipal Bond against Large Cap Growth.
GMUN has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GMUN | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08%Best | 0.18% |
| AUM | $10M | $498.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.12% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 277 | 321 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.9%Best | 16.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -4.3%Best | -22.8% |
| $10,000 over 3.2 years | $10,938 | $25,646Best |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Municipal Bond | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Mar 7, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 121 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. GMUN has data through Jun 3, 2026 and QQQ through Oct 2, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 9, 2023 to Jun 3, 2026 (3.2 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 3.9% for GMUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.3% for GMUN and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GMUN charges 0.08% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $18 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GMUN currently yields 3.12% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 208 holdings in GMUN and 102 in QQQ, totalling 75.4% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 199 days apart, GMUN as of Feb 28, 2026 and QQQ as of Sep 15, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 208 positions we hold weights for in GMUN and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 277 and 321.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GMUN and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GMUN or QQQ?
GMUN has an expense ratio of 0.08% while QQQ charges 0.18%. GMUN is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, GMUN or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 3.9% for GMUN. Worst drawdown: GMUN -4.3% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both GMUN and QQQ?
GMUN and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GMUN or QQQ?
GMUN yields 3.12% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so GMUN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than GMUN?
GMUN has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.