GMUN vs QQQ
Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
GMUN has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. GMUN offers more diversification with 277 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GMUN | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $10M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.12% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 277 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -0.72% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.67% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.91% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 7, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
GMUN vs QQQ Performance
Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF (GMUN) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GMUN returned +4.67% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, GMUN is down 0.72% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, GMUN compounded at +2.91% per year against +25.96% for QQQ. Across the full 3-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +2.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 3.9% for GMUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.3% for GMUN and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GMUN charges 0.08% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $18 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GMUN currently yields 3.12% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
GMUN and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 310 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GMUN or QQQ?
GMUN has an expense ratio of 0.08% while QQQ charges 0.18%. GMUN is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $10 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GMUN or QQQ?
Over the past year GMUN returned +4.67% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), GMUN annualized +2.84% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GMUN or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 3.9% for GMUN. Worst drawdown: GMUN -4.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both GMUN and QQQ?
GMUN and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GMUN and QQQ?
GMUN and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 310 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GMUN or QQQ?
GMUN yields 3.12% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so GMUN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.