GMUN vs VXUS
Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GMUN | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $10M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.12% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 277 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -0.72% | +14.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.67% | +27.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.91% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.14% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.3% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 7, 2023 | Jan 26, 2011 |
GMUN vs VXUS Performance
Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF (GMUN) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GMUN returned +4.67% while VXUS returned +27.24%. Year to date, GMUN is down 0.72% versus a gain of 14.07% for VXUS.
Over three years, GMUN compounded at +2.91% per year against +19.27% for VXUS. Across the full 3-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.83% annualized vs +2.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 3.9% for GMUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.3% for GMUN and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GMUN charges 0.08% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $5 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GMUN currently yields 3.12% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
GMUN and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 8069 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GMUN or VXUS?
GMUN has an expense ratio of 0.08% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GMUN or VXUS?
Over the past year GMUN returned +4.67% vs +27.24% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), GMUN annualized +2.84% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GMUN or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 3.9% for GMUN. Worst drawdown: GMUN -4.3% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both GMUN and VXUS?
GMUN and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GMUN and VXUS?
GMUN and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8069 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GMUN or VXUS?
GMUN yields 3.12% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so GMUN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.