GOCT vs PSFM
FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October vs Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF
Which is better, GOCT or PSFM?
PSFM has been ahead.
PSFM has a lower expense ratio. PSFM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GOCT | PSFM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $450M | $26M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 16 | 14 |
| YTD Return | +9.10% | +12.81%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.99% | +14.41%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.26% | +13.51%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.46% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.7%Best | 6.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -10.5%Best | -14.1% |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $14,221 | $15,199Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Pacer ETFs |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2023 | Mar 31, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 23, 2023 to Nov 11, 2026 (3.1 years).
GOCT vs PSFM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
GOCT vs PSFM Performance
FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October (GOCT) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF (PSFM) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year GOCT returned +9.99% while PSFM returned +14.41%. Year to date, GOCT is up 9.10% versus a gain of 12.81% for PSFM.
Over three years, GOCT compounded at +11.26% per year against +13.51% for PSFM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSFM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.8% compared with 5.7% for GOCT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.5% for GOCT and -14.1% for PSFM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GOCT charges 0.85% per year while PSFM charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $49 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GOCT currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for PSFM.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GOCT and PSFM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GOCT or PSFM?
GOCT has an expense ratio of 0.85% while PSFM charges 0.49%. PSFM is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GOCT or PSFM?
Over the past year GOCT returned +9.99% vs +14.41% for PSFM, so PSFM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GOCT or PSFM?
PSFM has been the more volatile fund at 6.8% annualized versus 5.7% for GOCT. Worst drawdown: GOCT -10.5% vs PSFM -14.1%.
Should I hold both GOCT and PSFM?
GOCT and PSFM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GOCT or PSFM?
GOCT yields 0.00% while PSFM yields 0.00%, so PSFM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PSFM better than GOCT?
PSFM has a lower expense ratio. PSFM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.