GRNJ vs VTI

GRNJ vs VTI

Which is better, GRNJ or VTI?

Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. GRNJ is less concentrated, with 18.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: GRNJ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGRNJVTI
Expense Ratio0.75%0.03%Best
AUM$500M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.03%
Holdings633,543
YTD Return+13.18%+13.60%Best
1Y Return-+18.17%
3Y Return (annualized)-+23.04%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.14%
Top 10 Weight18.1%Best33.3%
Fund FamilyFundstrat CapitalVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionNov 17, 2025May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

GRNJ vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

GRNJ vs VTI Performance

Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ) is an ETF from Fundstrat Capital and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, GRNJ is up 13.18% versus a gain of 13.60% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GRNJ charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GRNJ currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

GRNJ already in VTI92.1%
VTI already in GRNJ1.3%

92.1% of GRNJ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.3% of VTI's money is in holdings GRNJ also owns.

Most of GRNJ is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

58 positions in common, counted across the 63 positions we hold weights for in GRNJ and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 63 and 3,543.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,095 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for GRNJ (96.2% of the fund), and 3 for GRNJ that do not appear in VTI (4.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in GRNJWeight in VTIDifference
BECfd Bloom Energy Corp- A1.92%0.08%1.84%
ZETAZeta Global Holdings Corp-A1.91%0.01%1.90%
GLXYGalaxy Digital Inc Class A1.88%0.01%1.87%
PATHUipath Inc Series D-11.87%0.01%1.86%
DINOHF Sinclair Corp1.84%0.02%1.82%
EXELExelixis Inc1.78%0.02%1.76%
RDDTReddit Inc-Cl A1.75%0.03%1.72%
TPXTempur Sealy International Inc1.75%0.02%1.73%
SATS'echostar Communications Corp. Class 'a''1.72%0.02%1.70%
RGLDRoyal Gold Inc1.71%0.02%1.69%

92.1% of GRNJ is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

GRNJVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GRNJ or VTI?

GRNJ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between GRNJ and VTI?

92.1% of GRNJ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.3% of VTI's is in holdings GRNJ also owns. They hold 58 positions in common, counted across the 63 positions we hold weights for in GRNJ and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, GRNJ or VTI?

GRNJ yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than GRNJ?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. GRNJ is less concentrated, with 18.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.