GSIE vs IVV
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. GSIE offers more diversification with 673 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GSIE | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $6.1B | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.50% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 673 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +13.11% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.44% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.52% | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.27% | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -37.2% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2015 | May 15, 2000 |
GSIE vs IVV Performance
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GSIE returned +21.44% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, GSIE is up 13.11% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Over three years, GSIE compounded at +19.52% per year against +22.08% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +9.27% and +12.96% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, GSIE has the edge at +7.92% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.5% for GSIE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.2% for GSIE and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GSIE charges 0.25% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GSIE currently yields 2.50% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
GSIE and IVV share 0 holdings out of 1144 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GSIE or IVV?
GSIE has an expense ratio of 0.25% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GSIE or IVV?
Over the past year GSIE returned +21.44% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), GSIE annualized +7.92% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GSIE or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.5% for GSIE. Worst drawdown: GSIE -37.2% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GSIE and IVV?
GSIE and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GSIE and IVV?
GSIE and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1144 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GSIE or IVV?
GSIE yields 2.50% while IVV yields 1.10%, so GSIE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.