GTEK vs VYM
Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GTEK delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GTEK | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $227M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 69 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +42.38% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +64.41% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +32.41% | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.52% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 14, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
GTEK vs VYM Performance
Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GTEK returned +64.41% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, GTEK is up 42.38% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Over three years, GTEK compounded at +32.41% per year against +18.43% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +7.52% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, GTEK has the edge at +7.52% annualized vs +7.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GTEK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.8% for GTEK and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GTEK charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GTEK currently yields 0.00% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GTEK or VYM?
GTEK has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $71 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GTEK or VYM?
Over the past year GTEK returned +64.41% vs +26.05% for VYM, so GTEK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), GTEK annualized +7.52% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GTEK or VYM?
GTEK has been the more volatile fund at 27.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GTEK -53.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GTEK and VYM?
GTEK and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GTEK and VYM?
GTEK and VYM share 2 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 616 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GTEK or VYM?
GTEK yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.