GTOS vs HUSV
Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF vs First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF
Quick Verdict
GTOS has a lower expense ratio. HUSV delivered stronger 1-year returns. GTOS offers more diversification with 703 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GTOS | HUSV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.70% | |
| AUM | $124M | $85M | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.52% | 1.27% | |
| Holdings | 703 | 102 | |
| YTD Return | -0.74% | +7.02% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.17% | +2.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.69% | +9.92% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +5.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.9% | 13.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.8% | -35.7% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 9, 2022 | Aug 24, 2016 |
GTOS vs HUSV Performance
Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF (GTOS) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF (HUSV) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year GTOS returned +1.17% while HUSV returned +2.86%. Year to date, GTOS is down 0.74% versus a gain of 7.02% for HUSV.
Over three years, GTOS compounded at +4.69% per year against +9.92% for HUSV. Across the full 4-year window we track, HUSV has the edge at +8.33% annualized vs +4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HUSV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.2% compared with 1.9% for GTOS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.8% for GTOS and -35.7% for HUSV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GTOS charges 0.30% per year while HUSV charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $70 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GTOS currently yields 4.52% against 1.27% for HUSV.
Holdings Overlap
GTOS and HUSV share 1 holdings out of 359 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GTOS | Weight in HUSV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNP | 0.00% | 0.80% | 0.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GTOS or HUSV?
GTOS has an expense ratio of 0.30% while HUSV charges 0.70%. GTOS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $40 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GTOS or HUSV?
Over the past year GTOS returned +1.17% vs +2.86% for HUSV, so HUSV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), GTOS annualized +4.30% vs +8.33% for HUSV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GTOS or HUSV?
HUSV has been the more volatile fund at 13.2% annualized versus 1.9% for GTOS. Worst drawdown: GTOS -1.8% vs HUSV -35.7%.
Should I hold both GTOS and HUSV?
GTOS and HUSV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GTOS and HUSV?
GTOS and HUSV share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 359 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GTOS or HUSV?
GTOS yields 4.52% while HUSV yields 1.27%, so GTOS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.