GXDW vs VOO
Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GXDW | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $7M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.55% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -2.60% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | -5.97% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +0.98% | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -12.80% | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -67.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 25, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
GXDW vs VOO Performance
Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF (GXDW) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GXDW returned -5.97% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, GXDW is down 2.60% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Over three years, GXDW compounded at +0.98% per year against +22.06% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -12.80% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs -0.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GXDW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.4% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.8% for GXDW and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GXDW charges 0.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GXDW currently yields 1.55% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
GXDW and VOO share 0 holdings out of 510 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GXDW or VOO?
GXDW has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GXDW or VOO?
Over the past year GXDW returned -5.97% vs +21.87% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), GXDW annualized -0.06% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GXDW or VOO?
GXDW has been the more volatile fund at 28.4% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GXDW -67.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GXDW and VOO?
GXDW and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GXDW and VOO?
GXDW and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 510 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GXDW or VOO?
GXDW yields 1.55% while VOO yields 1.08%, so GXDW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.