GXUS vs IVV
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Total International Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. GXUS offers more diversification with 1567 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GXUS | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $623M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.30% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 2,473 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +15.74% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.38% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.75% | +21.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 31, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
GXUS vs IVV Performance
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Total International Equity ETF (GXUS) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GXUS returned +28.38% while IVV returned +23.01%. Year to date, GXUS is up 15.74% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, GXUS compounded at +18.75% per year against +21.77% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, GXUS has the edge at +17.98% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.7% for GXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.3% for GXUS and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GXUS charges 0.18% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $3 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GXUS currently yields 2.30% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
GXUS and IVV share 5 holdings out of 2067 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GXUS or IVV?
GXUS has an expense ratio of 0.18% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GXUS or IVV?
Over the past year GXUS returned +28.38% vs +23.01% for IVV, so GXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), GXUS annualized +17.98% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GXUS or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.7% for GXUS. Worst drawdown: GXUS -14.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GXUS and IVV?
GXUS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GXUS and IVV?
GXUS and IVV share 5 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2067 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GXUS or IVV?
GXUS yields 2.30% while IVV yields 1.09%, so GXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.