HBDC vs IVV
Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HBDC | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $85M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.37% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 259 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +1.67% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.50% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -3.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Hilton Capital Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 10, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
HBDC vs IVV Performance
Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF (HBDC) is a ETF from Hilton Capital Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year HBDC returned +3.50% while IVV returned +22.02%. Year to date, HBDC is up 1.67% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 2.2% for HBDC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.0% for HBDC and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HBDC charges 0.39% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HBDC currently yields 5.37% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
HBDC and IVV share 0 holdings out of 611 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HBDC or IVV?
HBDC has an expense ratio of 0.39% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HBDC or IVV?
Over the past year HBDC returned +3.50% vs +22.02% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), HBDC annualized +3.65% vs +7.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HBDC or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 2.2% for HBDC. Worst drawdown: HBDC -3.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both HBDC and IVV?
HBDC and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HBDC and IVV?
HBDC and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 611 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HBDC or IVV?
HBDC yields 5.37% while IVV yields 1.09%, so HBDC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.