HCOM vs PATN
HCOM vs PATN
Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
Quick Verdict
HCOM has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. PATN offers more diversification with 101 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HCOM | PATN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.65% | |
| AUM | $9M | $194M | |
| Dividend Yield | 10.95% | 1.59% | |
| Holdings | 55 | 106 | |
| YTD Return | +0.71% | +28.86% | |
| 1Y Return | -4.90% | +52.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -6.95% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.7% | 21.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -28.8% | -16.8% | |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | Pacer ETFs | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 14, 2021 | Sep 16, 2024 |
HCOM vs PATN Performance
Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF (HCOM) is a ETF from Hartford Funds and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year HCOM returned -4.90% while PATN returned +52.39%. Year to date, HCOM is up 0.71% versus a gain of 28.86% for PATN.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PATN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.0% compared with 14.7% for HCOM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.8% for HCOM and -16.8% for PATN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HCOM charges 0.59% per year while PATN charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $65 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HCOM currently yields 10.95% against 1.59% for PATN.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HCOM or PATN?
HCOM has an expense ratio of 0.59% while PATN charges 0.65%. HCOM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HCOM or PATN?
Over the past year HCOM returned -4.90% vs +52.39% for PATN, so PATN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), HCOM annualized +0.68% vs +37.68% for PATN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HCOM or PATN?
PATN has been the more volatile fund at 21.0% annualized versus 14.7% for HCOM. Worst drawdown: HCOM -28.8% vs PATN -16.8%.
Which pays a higher dividend, HCOM or PATN?
HCOM yields 10.95% while PATN yields 1.59%, so HCOM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.