HDMV vs VTI
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed International ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HDMV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $17M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.99% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 163 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +11.71% | +13.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.51% | +22.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.55% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.54% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2016 | May 24, 2001 |
HDMV vs VTI Performance
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed International ETF (HDMV) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HDMV returned +14.51% while VTI returned +22.17%. Year to date, HDMV is up 11.71% versus a gain of 13.67% for VTI.
Over three years, HDMV compounded at +16.55% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.54% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.11% annualized vs +4.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.8% for HDMV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.5% for HDMV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HDMV charges 0.80% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $3 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HDMV currently yields 3.99% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
HDMV and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2935 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HDMV | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SGP:AU | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HDMV or VTI?
HDMV has an expense ratio of 0.80% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $77 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HDMV or VTI?
Over the past year HDMV returned +14.51% vs +22.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), HDMV annualized +4.80% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HDMV or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.8% for HDMV. Worst drawdown: HDMV -35.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both HDMV and VTI?
HDMV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HDMV and VTI?
HDMV and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2935 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HDMV or VTI?
HDMV yields 3.99% while VTI yields 1.07%, so HDMV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.