HECA vs IVV
Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HECA | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.02% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $289M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.04% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 22 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -0.48% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.32% | +23.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -12.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Hedgeye Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 30, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
HECA vs IVV Performance
Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF (HECA) is a ETF from Hedgeye Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year HECA returned +11.32% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, HECA is down 0.48% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.4% for HECA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.8% for HECA and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.08. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HECA charges 1.02% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $102 vs $3 annually, a gap of $99 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HECA currently yields 2.04% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
HECA and IVV share 35 holdings out of 518 unique holdings combined, representing a 39.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HECA or IVV?
HECA has an expense ratio of 1.02% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $99 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HECA or IVV?
Over the past year HECA returned +11.32% vs +23.70% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), HECA annualized +11.44% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HECA or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.4% for HECA. Worst drawdown: HECA -12.8% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both HECA and IVV?
HECA and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.08, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HECA and IVV?
HECA and IVV share 35 common holdings with a 39.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 518 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HECA or IVV?
HECA yields 2.04% while IVV yields 1.09%, so HECA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.