HIBS vs VTI
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HIBS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.06% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $18M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.68% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 8 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -60.29% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | -76.82% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -63.33% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -55.39% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 74.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 7, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
HIBS vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X ETF (HIBS) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HIBS returned -76.82% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, HIBS is down 60.29% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, HIBS compounded at -63.33% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -55.39% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs -68.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HIBS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 74.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for HIBS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.85. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HIBS charges 1.06% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $106 vs $3 annually, a gap of $103 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HIBS currently yields 7.68% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
HIBS and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2790 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HIBS or VTI?
HIBS has an expense ratio of 1.06% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $103 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HIBS or VTI?
Over the past year HIBS returned -76.82% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), HIBS annualized -68.06% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HIBS or VTI?
HIBS has been the more volatile fund at 74.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: HIBS -100.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both HIBS and VTI?
HIBS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HIBS and VTI?
HIBS and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2790 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HIBS or VTI?
HIBS yields 7.68% while VTI yields 1.07%, so HIBS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.