HIBS vs VOO
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HIBS | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.06% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $18M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.68% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 8 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -58.37% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | -75.37% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -62.48% | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -55.63% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 74.5% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 7, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
HIBS vs VOO Performance
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X ETF (HIBS) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HIBS returned -75.37% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, HIBS is down 58.37% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, HIBS compounded at -62.48% per year against +21.79% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -55.63% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.45% annualized vs -67.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HIBS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 74.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for HIBS and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.84. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HIBS charges 1.06% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $106 vs $3 annually, a gap of $103 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HIBS currently yields 7.68% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
HIBS and VOO share 0 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HIBS or VOO?
HIBS has an expense ratio of 1.06% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $103 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HIBS or VOO?
Over the past year HIBS returned -75.37% vs +20.92% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), HIBS annualized -67.85% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HIBS or VOO?
HIBS has been the more volatile fund at 74.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: HIBS -100.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both HIBS and VOO?
HIBS and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HIBS and VOO?
HIBS and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HIBS or VOO?
HIBS yields 7.68% while VOO yields 1.08%, so HIBS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.