HIMZ vs IVV
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HIMZ | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.29% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $63M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.29% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 11 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -66.56% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | -88.39% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 219.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -98.2% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Defiance ETFs, LLC | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 12, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
HIMZ vs IVV Performance
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) is a ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year HIMZ returned -88.39% while IVV returned +22.02%. Year to date, HIMZ is down 66.56% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HIMZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 219.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -98.2% for HIMZ and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.21. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HIMZ charges 1.29% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $129 vs $3 annually, a gap of $126 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HIMZ currently yields 0.29% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
HIMZ and IVV share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HIMZ or IVV?
HIMZ has an expense ratio of 1.29% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $126 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HIMZ or IVV?
Over the past year HIMZ returned -88.39% vs +22.02% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), HIMZ annualized -77.19% vs +7.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HIMZ or IVV?
HIMZ has been the more volatile fund at 219.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: HIMZ -98.2% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both HIMZ and IVV?
HIMZ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.21, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HIMZ and IVV?
HIMZ and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HIMZ or IVV?
HIMZ yields 0.29% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.