HIMZ vs VOO
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HIMZ | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.29% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $63M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.29% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 11 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -62.11% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | -87.75% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 219.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -98.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Defiance ETFs, LLC | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 12, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
HIMZ vs VOO Performance
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) is a ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HIMZ returned -87.75% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, HIMZ is down 62.11% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HIMZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 219.7% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -98.2% for HIMZ and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.23. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HIMZ charges 1.29% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $129 vs $3 annually, a gap of $126 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HIMZ currently yields 0.29% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
HIMZ and VOO share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HIMZ or VOO?
HIMZ has an expense ratio of 1.29% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $126 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HIMZ or VOO?
Over the past year HIMZ returned -87.75% vs +22.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), HIMZ annualized -75.22% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HIMZ or VOO?
HIMZ has been the more volatile fund at 219.7% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: HIMZ -98.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both HIMZ and VOO?
HIMZ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.23, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HIMZ and VOO?
HIMZ and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HIMZ or VOO?
HIMZ yields 0.29% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.