HOOG vs VTI
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HOOG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $66M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 31.50% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -27.43% | +13.95% | |
| 1Y Return | -24.18% | +21.44% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.10% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.77% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 144.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -86.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Leverage Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 21, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
HOOG vs VTI Performance
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) is a ETF from Leverage Shares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HOOG returned -24.18% while VTI returned +21.44%. Year to date, HOOG is down 27.43% versus a gain of 13.95% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HOOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 144.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -86.9% for HOOG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HOOG charges 0.85% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HOOG currently yields 31.50% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
HOOG and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HOOG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HOOD | 62.14% | 0.11% | 62.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HOOG or VTI?
HOOG has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HOOG or VTI?
Over the past year HOOG returned -24.18% vs +21.44% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), HOOG annualized +110.06% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HOOG or VTI?
HOOG has been the more volatile fund at 144.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: HOOG -86.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both HOOG and VTI?
HOOG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HOOG and VTI?
HOOG and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HOOG or VTI?
HOOG yields 31.50% while VTI yields 1.07%, so HOOG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.