HOOG vs VYM
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HOOG | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $57M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 22.23% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -55.17% | +16.53% | |
| 1Y Return | -64.42% | +25.03% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.25% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 145.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -86.9% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Leverage Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 21, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
HOOG vs VYM Performance
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) is a ETF from Leverage Shares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HOOG returned -64.42% while VYM returned +25.03%. Year to date, HOOG is down 55.17% versus a gain of 16.53% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HOOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 145.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -86.9% for HOOG and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.08. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HOOG charges 0.85% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $4 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HOOG currently yields 22.23% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
HOOG and VYM share 0 holdings out of 560 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HOOG or VYM?
HOOG has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $81 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HOOG or VYM?
Over the past year HOOG returned -64.42% vs +25.03% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), HOOG annualized +53.53% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HOOG or VYM?
HOOG has been the more volatile fund at 145.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: HOOG -86.9% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both HOOG and VYM?
HOOG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.08, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HOOG and VYM?
HOOG and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 560 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HOOG or VYM?
HOOG yields 22.23% while VYM yields 2.86%, so HOOG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.