HOOW vs IVV
Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HOOW | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $142M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 167.48% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -41.63% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | -37.90% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 68.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -65.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 18, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
HOOW vs IVV Performance
Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year HOOW returned -37.90% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, HOOW is down 41.63% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HOOW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 68.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -65.7% for HOOW and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HOOW charges 0.99% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $3 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HOOW currently yields 167.48% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
HOOW and IVV share 1 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HOOW | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HOOD | 3.54% | 0.13% | 3.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HOOW or IVV?
HOOW has an expense ratio of 0.99% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HOOW or IVV?
Over the past year HOOW returned -37.90% vs +20.94% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), HOOW annualized -8.54% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HOOW or IVV?
HOOW has been the more volatile fund at 68.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: HOOW -65.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both HOOW and IVV?
HOOW and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HOOW and IVV?
HOOW and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HOOW or IVV?
HOOW yields 167.48% while IVV yields 1.10%, so HOOW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.