HOOW vs VTI
Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HOOW | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $142M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 167.48% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -32.03% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | -28.44% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 72.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -65.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 18, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
HOOW vs VTI Performance
Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HOOW returned -28.44% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, HOOW is down 32.03% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HOOW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 72.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -65.7% for HOOW and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HOOW charges 0.99% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $3 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HOOW currently yields 167.48% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
HOOW and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HOOW | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HOOD | 3.54% | 0.11% | 3.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HOOW or VTI?
HOOW has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HOOW or VTI?
Over the past year HOOW returned -28.44% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), HOOW annualized +4.14% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HOOW or VTI?
HOOW has been the more volatile fund at 72.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: HOOW -65.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both HOOW and VTI?
HOOW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HOOW and VTI?
HOOW and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HOOW or VTI?
HOOW yields 167.48% while VTI yields 1.07%, so HOOW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.