IBGC vs IVV
iShares iBonds Dec 2046 Term Treasury ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, IBGC or IVV?
Long Term Government Bond against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBGC | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.07% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $30M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.63% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 8 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -2.69% | +12.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.38% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Long Term Government Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 25, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IBGC vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IBGC vs IVV Performance
iShares iBonds Dec 2046 Term Treasury ETF (IBGC) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, IBGC is down 2.69% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBGC charges 0.07% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $3 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBGC currently yields 1.63% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings IBGC also owns.
Stated as a floor: for IBGC, our book for it covers 40.0% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 5 positions we hold weights for in IBGC and 490 in IVV, against full books of 8 and 508.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IBGC | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLABlackrock Cash Funds: Treasury, Sl Agency Shares | 1.24% | 0.15% | 1.09% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IBGC and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBGC or IVV?
IBGC has an expense ratio of 0.07% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBGC or IVV?
IBGC yields 1.63% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IBGC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than IBGC?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.