IBIK vs IVV
iShares iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBIK | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $89M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.59% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 3 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +0.95% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.73% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -5.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | May 22, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
IBIK vs IVV Performance
iShares iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS ETF (IBIK) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IBIK returned +2.73% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, IBIK is up 0.95% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 4.7% for IBIK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.6% for IBIK and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.31. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBIK charges 0.10% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $3 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBIK currently yields 5.59% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
IBIK and IVV share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBIK or IVV?
IBIK has an expense ratio of 0.10% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $7 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IBIK or IVV?
Over the past year IBIK returned +2.73% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IBIK annualized +4.89% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IBIK or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 4.7% for IBIK. Worst drawdown: IBIK -5.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both IBIK and IVV?
IBIK and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.31, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IBIK and IVV?
IBIK and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBIK or IVV?
IBIK yields 5.59% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IBIK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.