IBMS vs VXUS
IBMS vs VXUS
iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Muni Bond ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBMS | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $314M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.51% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 1,644 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -1.15% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.50% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -3.0% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | May 22, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
IBMS vs VXUS Performance
iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMS) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IBMS returned +0.50% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, IBMS is down 1.15% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 3.3% for IBMS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.0% for IBMS and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBMS charges 0.18% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $5 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBMS currently yields 2.51% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
IBMS and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 8110 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBMS or VXUS?
IBMS has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $13 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IBMS or VXUS?
Over the past year IBMS returned +0.50% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IBMS annualized +3.15% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IBMS or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 3.3% for IBMS. Worst drawdown: IBMS -3.0% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both IBMS and VXUS?
IBMS and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IBMS and VXUS?
IBMS and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8110 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBMS or VXUS?
IBMS yields 2.51% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.