IBND vs VXUS
IBND vs VXUS
State Street SPDR Bloomberg International Corporate Bond ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBND | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $454M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.76% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 968 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -0.92% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | -0.13% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.48% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.12% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | May 19, 2010 | Jan 26, 2011 |
IBND vs VXUS Performance
State Street SPDR Bloomberg International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IBND returned -0.13% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, IBND is down 0.92% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, IBND compounded at +5.48% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -1.12% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs +0.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 9.6% for IBND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.6% for IBND and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBND charges 0.50% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $5 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBND currently yields 2.76% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
IBND and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7902 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBND or VXUS?
IBND has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IBND or VXUS?
Over the past year IBND returned -0.13% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IBND annualized +0.72% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IBND or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 9.6% for IBND. Worst drawdown: IBND -35.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both IBND and VXUS?
IBND and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IBND and VXUS?
IBND and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7902 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBND or VXUS?
IBND yields 2.76% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so IBND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.