IBTM vs QQQ
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
IBTM has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBTM | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.07% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $563M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.95% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 17 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -0.57% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.74% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.05% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.4% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 6, 2022 | Mar 10, 1999 |
IBTM vs QQQ Performance
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IBTM returned +1.74% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, IBTM is down 0.57% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, IBTM compounded at +4.05% per year against +25.96% for QQQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +1.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 7.4% for IBTM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.6% for IBTM and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBTM charges 0.07% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $18 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBTM currently yields 3.95% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
IBTM and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 114 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBTM or QQQ?
IBTM has an expense ratio of 0.07% while QQQ charges 0.18%. IBTM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IBTM or QQQ?
Over the past year IBTM returned +1.74% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IBTM annualized +1.39% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IBTM or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 7.4% for IBTM. Worst drawdown: IBTM -13.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both IBTM and QQQ?
IBTM and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IBTM and QQQ?
IBTM and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 114 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBTM or QQQ?
IBTM yields 3.95% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so IBTM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.