IBTP vs VTI
iShares iBonds Dec 2034 Term Treasury ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBTP | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.07% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $283M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.03% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -1.34% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.03% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -6.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 11, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
IBTP vs VTI Performance
iShares iBonds Dec 2034 Term Treasury ETF (IBTP) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IBTP returned +1.03% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, IBTP is down 1.34% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 5.4% for IBTP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.9% for IBTP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.19. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBTP charges 0.07% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $3 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBTP currently yields 4.03% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
IBTP and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2787 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBTP or VTI?
IBTP has an expense ratio of 0.07% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IBTP or VTI?
Over the past year IBTP returned +1.03% vs +23.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IBTP annualized +3.60% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IBTP or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 5.4% for IBTP. Worst drawdown: IBTP -6.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IBTP and VTI?
IBTP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.19, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IBTP and VTI?
IBTP and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2787 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBTP or VTI?
IBTP yields 4.03% while VTI yields 1.07%, so IBTP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.