IDOG vs IVV
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IDOG delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IDOG | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $539M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.54% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 51 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +15.92% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.70% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.70% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.08% | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.9% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 27, 2013 | May 15, 2000 |
IDOG vs IVV Performance
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IDOG returned +28.70% while IVV returned +22.02%. Year to date, IDOG is up 15.92% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Over three years, IDOG compounded at +21.70% per year against +21.80% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +14.08% and +13.37% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +6.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IDOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.9% for IDOG and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IDOG charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IDOG currently yields 4.54% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
IDOG and IVV share 0 holdings out of 555 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IDOG or IVV?
IDOG has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IDOG or IVV?
Over the past year IDOG returned +28.70% vs +22.02% for IVV, so IDOG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), IDOG annualized +6.42% vs +7.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IDOG or IVV?
IDOG has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IDOG -46.9% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both IDOG and IVV?
IDOG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IDOG and IVV?
IDOG and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 555 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IDOG or IVV?
IDOG yields 4.54% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IDOG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.