IDOG vs QQQ
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. IDOG delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IDOG | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $565M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.25% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 51 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +17.98% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.55% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.12% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.93% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.9% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 27, 2013 | Mar 10, 1999 |
IDOG vs QQQ Performance
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IDOG returned +30.55% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, IDOG is up 17.98% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, IDOG compounded at +23.12% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +14.93% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +6.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 15.6% for IDOG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.9% for IDOG and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IDOG charges 0.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $18 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IDOG currently yields 4.25% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
IDOG and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 152 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IDOG or QQQ?
IDOG has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IDOG or QQQ?
Over the past year IDOG returned +30.55% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so IDOG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), IDOG annualized +6.55% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IDOG or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 15.6% for IDOG. Worst drawdown: IDOG -46.9% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both IDOG and QQQ?
IDOG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IDOG and QQQ?
IDOG and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 152 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IDOG or QQQ?
IDOG yields 4.25% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so IDOG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.