IDV vs VTI
iShares International Select Dividend ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IDV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IDV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $8.2B | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.50% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 125 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +11.53% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.33% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.33% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.47% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.6% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -76.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 11, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
IDV vs VTI Performance
iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IDV returned +24.33% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, IDV is up 11.53% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, IDV compounded at +25.33% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.47% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +1.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -76.3% for IDV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IDV charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IDV currently yields 5.50% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
IDV and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2880 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IDV | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ORA | 1.51% | 0.00% | 1.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IDV or VTI?
IDV has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IDV or VTI?
Over the past year IDV returned +24.33% vs +22.39% for VTI, so IDV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), IDV annualized +1.04% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IDV or VTI?
IDV has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IDV -76.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IDV and VTI?
IDV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IDV and VTI?
IDV and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2880 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IDV or VTI?
IDV yields 5.50% while VTI yields 1.07%, so IDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.