IEFA vs VOO

IEFA vs VOO

Which is better, IEFA or VOO?

VOO has been ahead.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IEFA is less concentrated, with 11.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOOLess Concentrated: IEFA

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIEFAVOO
Expense Ratio0.07%0.03%Best
AUM$193.3B$997.4B
Dividend Yield3.29%1.04%
Holdings2,640509
YTD Return+10.09%+14.14%Best
1Y Return+16.27%+17.31%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+18.55%+23.04%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+8.59%+13.63%Best
Volatility (annualized)14.3%14.2%Best
Max Drawdown-34.8%-34.3%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$15,099$18,944Best
Top 10 Weight11.8%Best37.6%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionOct 18, 2012Sep 7, 2010

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 22, 2012 to Sep 22, 2026 (13.9 years).

IEFA vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 13.9 years both funds cover.

IEFA vs VOO Performance

iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IEFA returned +16.27% while VOO returned +17.31%. Year to date, IEFA is up 10.09% versus a gain of 14.14% for VOO.

Over three years, IEFA compounded at +18.55% per year against +23.04% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.59% and +13.63% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.56% annualized vs +8.26%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IEFA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.8% for IEFA and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IEFA charges 0.07% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $3 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IEFA currently yields 3.29% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

IEFA already in VOO1.5%
VOO already in IEFA0.2%

1.5% of IEFA's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.2% of VOO's money is in holdings IEFA also owns.

IEFA and VOO share little of their money.

4 positions in common, counted across the 2,580 positions we hold weights for in IEFA and 494 in VOO, against full books of 2,640 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 483 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for IEFA (99.0% of the fund), and 23 for IEFA that do not appear in VOO (2.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IEFAWeight in VOODifference
ROPRoper Technologies Inc.1.15%0.06%1.09%
DGDollar General Corp.0.24%0.04%0.20%
EQTEQT Corp.0.06%0.05%0.01%
RFRegions Financial Corp.0.01%0.04%0.03%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IEFA and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IEFAVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IEFA or VOO?

IEFA has an expense ratio of 0.07% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IEFA or VOO?

Over the past year IEFA returned +16.27% vs +17.31% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), IEFA annualized +8.26% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IEFA or VOO?

IEFA has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: IEFA -34.8% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both IEFA and VOO?

IEFA and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between IEFA and VOO?

1.5% of IEFA's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.2% of VOO's is in holdings IEFA also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 2,580 positions we hold weights for in IEFA and 494 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, IEFA or VOO?

IEFA yields 3.29% while VOO yields 1.04%, so IEFA currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than IEFA?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IEFA is less concentrated, with 11.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.