IGBH vs PATN
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
Quick Verdict
IGBH has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. IGBH offers more diversification with 4,130 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IGBH | PATN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.14% | 0.65% | |
| AUM | $233M | $234M | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.62% | 1.67% | |
| Holdings | 4,130 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +2.18% | +30.11% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.92% | +51.30% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.66% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.45% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.5% | 21.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -38.9% | -16.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Pacer ETFs | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2015 | Sep 16, 2024 |
IGBH vs PATN Performance
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGBH) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year IGBH returned +5.92% while PATN returned +51.30%. Year to date, IGBH is up 2.18% versus a gain of 30.11% for PATN.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PATN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.1% compared with 7.5% for IGBH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.9% for IGBH and -16.8% for PATN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.28. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IGBH charges 0.14% per year while PATN charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $14 vs $65 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IGBH currently yields 5.62% against 1.67% for PATN.
Holdings Overlap
IGBH and PATN share 0 holdings out of 177 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IGBH or PATN?
IGBH has an expense ratio of 0.14% while PATN charges 0.65%. IGBH is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $51 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IGBH or PATN?
Over the past year IGBH returned +5.92% vs +51.30% for PATN, so PATN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IGBH annualized +2.91% vs +37.49% for PATN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IGBH or PATN?
PATN has been the more volatile fund at 21.1% annualized versus 7.5% for IGBH. Worst drawdown: IGBH -38.9% vs PATN -16.8%.
Should I hold both IGBH and PATN?
IGBH and PATN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.28, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IGBH and PATN?
IGBH and PATN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 177 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IGBH or PATN?
IGBH yields 5.62% while PATN yields 1.67%, so IGBH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.