IGBH vs SBIO
IGBH vs SBIO
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF vs ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF
Quick Verdict
IGBH has a lower expense ratio. SBIO delivered stronger 1-year returns. SBIO offers more diversification with 105 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IGBH | SBIO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.14% | 0.50% | |
| AUM | $203M | $202M | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.68% | 4.05% | |
| Holdings | 4,130 | 87 | |
| YTD Return | +1.43% | +34.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.80% | +106.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.55% | +32.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.34% | +9.56% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.5% | 29.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -38.9% | -63.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | ALPS Advisors | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2015 | Dec 30, 2014 |
IGBH vs SBIO Performance
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGBH) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors. Over the past year IGBH returned +5.80% while SBIO returned +106.24%. Year to date, IGBH is up 1.43% versus a gain of 34.80% for SBIO.
Over three years, IGBH compounded at +7.55% per year against +32.77% for SBIO; over five years the annualized figures are +5.34% and +9.56% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, SBIO has the edge at +9.80% annualized vs +2.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SBIO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.6% compared with 7.5% for IGBH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.9% for IGBH and -63.1% for SBIO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IGBH charges 0.14% per year while SBIO charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $14 vs $50 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IGBH currently yields 5.68% against 4.05% for SBIO.
Holdings Overlap
IGBH and SBIO share 0 holdings out of 181 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IGBH or SBIO?
IGBH has an expense ratio of 0.14% while SBIO charges 0.50%. IGBH is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IGBH or SBIO?
Over the past year IGBH returned +5.80% vs +106.24% for SBIO, so SBIO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), IGBH annualized +2.85% vs +9.80% for SBIO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IGBH or SBIO?
SBIO has been the more volatile fund at 29.6% annualized versus 7.5% for IGBH. Worst drawdown: IGBH -38.9% vs SBIO -63.1%.
Should I hold both IGBH and SBIO?
IGBH and SBIO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IGBH and SBIO?
IGBH and SBIO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 181 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IGBH or SBIO?
IGBH yields 5.68% while SBIO yields 4.05%, so IGBH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.