IGIB vs IVV
iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IGIB | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $18.6B | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.80% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 2,986 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -0.79% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.18% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.15% | +21.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.94% | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 5, 2007 | May 15, 2000 |
IGIB vs IVV Performance
iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IGIB returned +2.18% while IVV returned +23.01%. Year to date, IGIB is down 0.79% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, IGIB compounded at +6.15% per year against +21.77% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +0.94% and +13.39% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +1.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 5.7% for IGIB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.6% for IGIB and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IGIB charges 0.04% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $3 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IGIB currently yields 4.80% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
IGIB and IVV share 0 holdings out of 519 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IGIB or IVV?
IGIB has an expense ratio of 0.04% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IGIB or IVV?
Over the past year IGIB returned +2.18% vs +23.01% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IGIB annualized +1.26% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IGIB or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 5.7% for IGIB. Worst drawdown: IGIB -20.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both IGIB and IVV?
IGIB and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IGIB and IVV?
IGIB and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 519 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IGIB or IVV?
IGIB yields 4.80% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IGIB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.