IGRO vs IVV
iShares International Dividend Growth ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IGRO offers more diversification with 584 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IGRO | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.3B | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.62% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 584 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +10.86% | +13.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.87% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.99% | +22.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.96% | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -37.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 17, 2016 | May 15, 2000 |
IGRO vs IVV Performance
iShares International Dividend Growth ETF (IGRO) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IGRO returned +18.87% while IVV returned +21.62%. Year to date, IGRO is up 10.86% versus a gain of 13.22% for IVV.
Over three years, IGRO compounded at +17.99% per year against +22.17% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +8.96% and +13.42% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, IGRO has the edge at +7.99% annualized vs +7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.7% for IGRO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.0% for IGRO and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IGRO charges 0.15% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IGRO currently yields 2.62% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
IGRO and IVV share 4 holdings out of 1025 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IGRO or IVV?
IGRO has an expense ratio of 0.15% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IGRO or IVV?
Over the past year IGRO returned +18.87% vs +21.62% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), IGRO annualized +7.99% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IGRO or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.7% for IGRO. Worst drawdown: IGRO -37.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both IGRO and IVV?
IGRO and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IGRO and IVV?
IGRO and IVV share 4 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1025 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IGRO or IVV?
IGRO yields 2.62% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IGRO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.