IJJ vs IVV
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IJJ | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $9.0B | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.58% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 309 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +12.69% | +13.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.51% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.30% | +22.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.47% | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -59.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 24, 2000 | May 15, 2000 |
IJJ vs IVV Performance
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IJJ returned +18.51% while IVV returned +21.62%. Year to date, IJJ is up 12.69% versus a gain of 13.22% for IVV.
Over three years, IJJ compounded at +14.30% per year against +22.17% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +9.47% and +13.42% respectively. Across the full 26-year window we track, IJJ has the edge at +8.85% annualized vs +7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IJJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.6% for IJJ and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IJJ charges 0.18% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $3 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IJJ currently yields 1.58% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
IJJ and IVV share 0 holdings out of 532 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IJJ or IVV?
IJJ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IJJ or IVV?
Over the past year IJJ returned +18.51% vs +21.62% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (26 years), IJJ annualized +8.85% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IJJ or IVV?
IJJ has been the more volatile fund at 18.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IJJ -59.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both IJJ and IVV?
IJJ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IJJ and IVV?
IJJ and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 532 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IJJ or IVV?
IJJ yields 1.58% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IJJ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.